2020. 1. 23. 20:22ㆍ카테고리 없음
How to configure second router behind AT&T 6852ac (router has static IP). What default gateway to use? - Answered by a verified Network Technician. We use cookies to give you the best possible experience on our website. My Motorola Modem recently died, and ATT sent me a new one.
Best answer selected by garyscott.Hello.hope you can help. We are seeking to do the same thing (put an RVS4000 behind a uverse gateway, effectively making the gateway a modem).
Has this workaround been reliably working for you? I was prepared to do exactly this, but another user - who hasn't actually done it - called this approach a 'silly hack.' I don't care about labels, I just want to utilize an approach that works!So, please share how this has worked for you or if you adopted another solution.
Thanks in advance! Best answer selected by garyscott.Hello.hope you can help. We are seeking to do the same thing (put an RVS4000 behind a uverse gateway, effectively making the gateway a modem). Has this workaround been reliably working for you?
I was prepared to do exactly this, but another user - who hasn't actually done it - called this approach a 'silly hack.' I don't care about labels, I just want to utilize an approach that works!So, please share how this has worked for you or if you adopted another solution. Thanks in advance!Its not a hack. Not sure what he meant. The gateway cannot be put in bridge mode so the second best way is to use the DMZ method listed above. I had Uverse for several years and had it hooked up this way. I never had any problems.
It works fine. Best answer selected by garyscott.Hello.hope you can help. We are seeking to do the same thing (put an RVS4000 behind a uverse gateway, effectively making the gateway a modem).
Router Behind Router Att Phone
Has this workaround been reliably working for you? I was prepared to do exactly this, but another user - who hasn't actually done it - called this approach a 'silly hack.'
I don't care about labels, I just want to utilize an approach that works!So, please share how this has worked for you or if you adopted another solution. Thanks in advance!Its not a hack. Not sure what he meant. The gateway cannot be put in bridge mode so the second best way is to use the DMZ method listed above. I had Uverse for several years and had it hooked up this way. I never had any problems. It works fine.Thank you.I'm not sure what he meant either; I'm certainly going to try this method and see what happens (and I'll report back).He also sort of bagged on the RVS4000, too, which is surprising because in 4 years we've only had one reliability issue with the RVS.
Thanks for your post.
While looking at the Wired Interfaces section on the Pace 5268ac Residential Gateway for my AT&T Fiber service I noticed an option not enabled, which is called router-behind-router detection. Has anyone played with this setting by enabling it to see exactly what it does?Currently I have the onboard wireless disabled Fiber-PaceNetgearGbitSwitchTP-Linkwirelessrouter as the connectivity of the 2nd floor and wireless connectivity path. I also have other ports on the Pace and Netgear connecting more directly, but the Pace seems to be unaware of what is connected behind the TP-Link wireless router (configured for a different DHCP network).I was wondering if by enabling this router-behind-router detection if the Pace would discover this other network and the hosts hanging off of it. I'm surprised that nobody has responded as yet.If you enable that detection, it is supposed discover that a device behind the router is another router, and to force that device into DMZ mode.I remember back when I started with u-verse (in 2009). At that time, I had the 2Wire 3800-HGV. When I plugged my laptop into an ethernet port, it decided that my laptop was a 'router behind router' and put it into DMZ mode. I have no idea why it decided that.
So I turned off the router-behind-router detection, and took that laptop out of DMZ mode. And I have left that detection off ever since, because it was obviously broken.I currently have the 5286ac, and it came with router-behind-router detection disabled.
I'm happy to leave it that way. It is easy enough to put a secondary router into DMZ mode if I want to do that. I would rather do it manually, since I seem to be better than the gateway at determining what is a router.